University of Miami Law Review

Menu

Skip to content
  • News
    • Insights
  • About
    • About the Law Review
    • Masthead
    • Editorial Board
    • Membership
    • Contact Us
  • Print Edition
    • Volume 75
      • Volume 75, Issue 1
    • Volumes 69–74
      • Volume 74
        • Volume 74, Issue 4
        • Volume 74, Issue 3
        • Volume 74, Issue 2
        • Volume 74, Issue 1
      • Volume 73
        • Volume 73, Issue 4
        • Volume 73, Issue 3
        • Volume 73, Issue 2
        • Volume 73, Issue 1
      • Volume 72
        • Volume 72, Issue 4
        • Volume 72, Issue 3
        • Volume 72, Issue 2
        • Volume 72, Issue 1
      • Volume 71
        • Volume 71, Issue 4
        • Volume 71, Issue 3
        • Volume 71, Issue 2
        • Volume 71, Issue 1
      • Volume 70
        • Volume 70, Issue 4
        • Volume 70, Issue 3
        • Volume 70, Issue 2
        • Volume 70, Issue 1
      • Volume 69
        • Volume 69, Issue 4
        • Volume 69, Issue 3
        • Volume 69, Issue 2
        • Volume 69, Issue I
    • Past Issues
    • Subscription
  • Caveat
    • Volume 75
      • Volume 75, Issue 1
    • Volume 74
    • Volume 69
    • Special Issues
      • Petty Offenses Symposium Special Issue
  • 2021 Symposium
    • 2020 Symposium
    • 2019 Symposium
    • Past UMLR Symposia
  • Submissions
    • Online Edition
    • Print Edition
  • Alumni
    • About UMLR Alumni
    • Alumni Advisory Board
    • Young Alumni Council
    • Masthead Archive
  • Writing Competition

Volume 71, Issue 1

Masthead and Table of Contents

Articles

No Quick Fix: The Failure of Criminal Law and the Promise of Civil Law Remedies for Domestic Child Sex Trafficking
by Charisa Smith

The Mapmaker’s Dilemma in Evaluating High-End Inequality
by Daniel Shaviro

The Heartbreak of Not Making Automated External Defibrillators Available For Public Use
by Samuel D. Hodge, Jr. & Daria Koscielniak

Legal Paternalism and the Eclipse of Principle
by R. George Wright

Notes & Comments

Exclusive Groove: How Modern Substantial Similarity Law Invites Attenuated Infringement Claims at the Expense of Innovation and Sustainability in the Music Industry
by Mark Kuivila

Bringing Balance to the Force: The Militarization of America’s Police Force and its Consequences
by Anta Plowden

A Promise Realized? A Critical Review of Accountable Care Organizations Since the Enactment of the Affordable Care Act
by Jean Phillip Shami

 

UMLR NEWS

 

Juarez v. People of the State of Colorado: Is “Probably” Sufficient to Satisfy a Defense Attorney’s Duty to Give Clear Advice in the Face of Deportation?

November 18, 2020

 

Carney v. Adams: SCOTUS Considers Political Balance in Delaware Courts While the Nation Debates Politicization of Supreme Court Justice Nominations

November 9, 2020

 

United States v. Google LLC: Cracking Down on Big Tech

November 9, 2020

 

Fulton v. City of Philadelphia: LGBTQ Rights and Religious Freedom in the Wake of Amy Coney Barrett’s Confirmation

November 1, 2020

STAY CONNECTED

 

UMLR on Facebook     UMLR on Twitter     UMLR on LinkedIn     UMLR on RSS    UMLR on Instagram

Tweets by @UMLawReview




Blogroll

Southern District of Florida Blog
SCOTUS Blog
Above the Law
University of Miami Law Library
Wall Street Journal Law Blog
Florida Supreme Court high-profile cases
The Bluebook
Harvard Law Review
Black's Law
Jotwell

 

Juarez v. People of the State of Colorado: Is “Probably” Sufficient to Satisfy a Defense Attorney’s Duty to Give Clear Advice in the Face of Deportation?

 

Carney v. Adams: SCOTUS Considers Political Balance in Delaware Courts While the Nation Debates Politicization of Supreme Court Justice Nominations

 

United States v. Google LLC: Cracking Down on Big Tech

 

Fulton v. City of Philadelphia: LGBTQ Rights and Religious Freedom in the Wake of Amy Coney Barrett’s Confirmation

 

House Report on Competition in Digital Markets: Are Big Changes Coming to Big Tech?

Could not fetch feed from .

 

© 2021 University of Miami. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions of students, professors, and practitioners that appear on this site do not
reflect the official position of the University of Miami Law Review or the University of Miami School of Law on
any particular issue, legal or otherwise.