University of Miami Law Review

Menu

Skip to content
  • News
    • Insights
  • About
    • About the Law Review
    • Masthead
    • Editorial Board
    • Membership
    • Contact Us
  • Print Edition
    • Volume 75
      • Volume 75, Issue 1
      • Volume 75, Issue 2
    • Volumes 69–74
      • Volume 74
        • Volume 74, Issue 4
        • Volume 74, Issue 3
        • Volume 74, Issue 2
        • Volume 74, Issue 1
      • Volume 73
        • Volume 73, Issue 4
        • Volume 73, Issue 3
        • Volume 73, Issue 2
        • Volume 73, Issue 1
      • Volume 72
        • Volume 72, Issue 4
        • Volume 72, Issue 3
        • Volume 72, Issue 2
        • Volume 72, Issue 1
      • Volume 71
        • Volume 71, Issue 4
        • Volume 71, Issue 3
        • Volume 71, Issue 2
        • Volume 71, Issue 1
      • Volume 70
        • Volume 70, Issue 4
        • Volume 70, Issue 3
        • Volume 70, Issue 2
        • Volume 70, Issue 1
      • Volume 69
        • Volume 69, Issue 4
        • Volume 69, Issue 3
        • Volume 69, Issue 2
        • Volume 69, Issue I
    • Past Issues
    • Subscription
  • Caveat
    • Volume 75
      • Volume 75, Issue 1
    • Volume 74
    • Volume 69
    • Special Issues
      • Petty Offenses Symposium Special Issue
  • 2021 Symposium
    • 2020 Symposium
    • 2019 Symposium
    • Past UMLR Symposia
  • Submissions
    • Online Edition
    • Print Edition
  • Alumni
    • About UMLR Alumni
    • Alumni Advisory Board
    • Young Alumni Council
    • Masthead Archive
  • Writing Competition

Volume 70, Issue 4

Eleventh Circuit Issue

Masthead and Table of Contents

Foreword
by Hon. Darrin P. Gayles

Articles

ISIS’s Get Rich Quick Scheme: Sell the World’s Cultural Heritage on the Black Market—Purchasers of ISIS-Looted Syrian Artifacts Are Not Criminally Liable Under the NSPA and the McClain Doctrine in the Eleventh Circuit
by Lindsey Lazopoulos Friedman

Sentence Structure: Prohibiting “Second or Successive” Habeas Petitions After Patterson v. Secretary
by Christina M. Frohock

Hurst v. Florida’s Ha’p’orth of Tar: The Need to Revisit Caldwell, Clemons, and Proffitt
by Craig Trocino and Chance Meyer

That ‘70s Show: Why the 11th Circuit was Wrong to Rely on Cases from the 1970s to Decide a Cell- Phone Tracking Case
by David Oscar Markus and Nathan Freed Wessler

Notes

Neither Strict Nor Nuanced: The Balanced Standard For False Claims Act Pleading In The Eleventh Circuit
by C. Caitlin Giles

Cellphones, Stingrays, and Searches! An Inquiry into the Legality of Cellular Location Information
by Jeremy H. D’Amico

One of These Interns Is Not like the Others: How the Eleventh Circuit Misapplied the “Tweaked Primary Beneficiary” Test to Required Clinical Internships
by Samuel C. Goodman

 

 

Click here to order hard copies of individual articles

UMLR NEWS

 

In with the New, But Out with the Old?

April 11, 2021

 

NFTs and the Legitimizing Power of Copyright

April 4, 2021

 

Florida S.B. 48: The Florida Senate Prepares to Historically Expand School Choice

March 27, 2021

 

Winning, but at What Cost? The Problem of Loot Boxes in Video Games and How the FTC Could Help

March 21, 2021

STAY CONNECTED

 

UMLR on Facebook     UMLR on Twitter     UMLR on LinkedIn     UMLR on RSS    UMLR on Instagram

Tweets by @UMLawReview




Blogroll

Southern District of Florida Blog
SCOTUS Blog
Above the Law
University of Miami Law Library
Wall Street Journal Law Blog
Florida Supreme Court high-profile cases
The Bluebook
Harvard Law Review
Black's Law
Jotwell

 

In with the New, But Out with the Old?

 

NFTs and the Legitimizing Power of Copyright

 

Florida S.B. 48: The Florida Senate Prepares to Historically Expand School Choice

 

Winning, but at What Cost? The Problem of Loot Boxes in Video Games and How the FTC Could Help

 

Re-Contextualizing Medical Marijuana Reimbursements in Anticipation of Its Legalization

Could not fetch feed from .

 

© 2021 University of Miami. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions of students, professors, and practitioners that appear on this site do not
reflect the official position of the University of Miami Law Review or the University of Miami School of Law on
any particular issue, legal or otherwise.